AUTHOR: Darcia Narvaez
PUBLICATION NAME: Psychology Today
DATE OF PUBLICATION: Nov 9, 2010
SUMMARY: The Supreme Court was looking at arguments for and against the banning of selling violent video games to minors. There are some things that children can only learn from play; therefore, it is important for children to be able to play, but violent video games may not be the best option.
Some people however, believe that video games may teach as much, or even more than traditional games. Video games are far more complex than games such as pack man. Some people claim that this encourages more intelligence. Children must try something until they finally get it. This teaches them problem solving, and some even claim that it teaches children the scientific method. Therefore, video games can be good for children, as long as they continue to have face-to-face relationships and interactions. Real life interactions are still important, because video game tend to use primarily the primitive brain, which is not social.
On the other hand, when violent behaviors are repeated hundreds, or even thousands of times, it teaches children to be violent. Video games are addictive, because they give immediate rewards. Any addictive behavior can harm the brain before it is fully developed. This can lead to lack of maturity and less empathy for others. Both are important in a person’s adult life.
The affects of violent media on children is stronger than the affect of tobacco, and therefore is often considered a health risk. Although there are many plusses for video games, violent video games take away the ability for children to think and feel proper empathy in their futures, and therefore should not be allowed.
LINKS TO STUDY: N/A
ARTICLE: http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/moral-landscapes/201011/playing-violent-video-games-good-or-bad
SUBMITTED BY: Rachel Walker
No comments:
Post a Comment